← Volver a HcM HcM Historical Archive

Siege of Constantinople: Naval Tactics & Greek Fire

Evaluating maritime engineering, defensive fortification, and incendiary tech in the crisis of 717–718 CE.

Share on X Facebook LinkedIn

Table of Contents

Byzantine Empire Map

1. Geopolitical Context of the Second Umayyad Siege

In the summer of 717 CE, the Umayyad Caliphate dispatched an immense combined land and naval expedition under Maslama ibn Abd al-Malik to capture the Byzantine capital. The encirclement represented an existential threat to the Eastern Roman realm. Leo III, having recently seized the throne, mobilized the capital's specialized defenses and naval dromons to disrupt Arab blockade lines across the Bosphorus.

"The defense of the Golden Horn relied on a synchronized combination of naval incendiary technology and massive defensive boom chains." — HcM Strategic Studies.

Understanding the broader imperial resilience requires linking naval readiness with regional army recruitments detailed in our overview of the Byzantine Theme System.

Walls of Constantinople

3. Logistical Containment and the Defensive Role of the Theodosian Walls

While the navy controlled the maritime access, the triple-tiered Theodosian Walls thwarted all terrestrial assaults. Combined with an exceptionally harsh winter in 717–718 CE and Bulgarian harassing attacks led by Khan Tervel, the besieging Umayyad forces suffered severe logistical breakdown and ultimate withdrawal.

Economic stability, state monopolies, and trade infrastructure—such as the Imperial Silk Monopoly—provided the sustained financial backing necessary to stock grain reserves for multi-year defense operations.

Academic Sources & References